Van beleggers
voor beleggers
desktop iconMarkt Monitor
  • Word abonnee
  • Inloggen

    Inloggen

    • Geen account? Registreren

    Wachtwoord vergeten?

Ontvang nu dagelijks onze kooptips!

word abonnee

Aandeel BAM Groep Koninklijke AEX:BAMNB.NL, NL0000337319

  • 3,824 14 jun 2024 17:35
  • -0,132 (-3,34%) Dagrange 3,776 - 3,990
  • 1.399.206 Gem. (3M) 1,2M

Bam october

7.706 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 ... 386 »» | Laatste | Omlaag ↓
  1. forum rang 4 bartvde 3 oktober 2014 13:21
    BAM Nuttall could face further Cambridgeshire busway claim
    3 October, 2014 | By Greg Pitcher

    Bam Nuttall could face a fresh £31M claim over the troubled Cambridgeshire busway.

    Councillors at Cambridgeshire County Council will next week decide whether to act on expert advice that the contractor is responsible for defects on the transport system.

    Bam Nuttall last year agreed to pay £33M to the council to end a long-running dispute over delays handing over the busway.

    But now technical and legal experts have identified defects on the scheme that they say are affecting ride quality and could see passenger experience deteriorate further.

    Their report claimed:

    Shims and neoprene pads were put in without being fixed so they slip and cause movement of the beams
    Foundations were not deep enough as outlined in national guidelines on certain sections so they could move in the clay conditions
    Drainage is inadequate at two locations
    Joints between the guideway beams were too narrow to allow for thermal expansion of the beams
    Some bearings were out of position
    Some beams were not restrained enough by brackets so they move
    The council has been urged to begin a programme of works to rectify the problems, and to charge Bam Nuttall for this. Sections of the busway may need to be closed to carry out these works.

    Cambridgeshire service director, strategy and development Bob Menzies said: “The technical and legal advice is that these defects were created or left by the contractor and they should be fixed. More importantly this should be paid for by Bam Nuttall.”

    The busway missed its original opening date in 2009, and the council charged Bam Nuttall a daily £14,000 fee for late delivery.

    After a number of attempts, the scheme was finally handed over in May 2011.

    The council brought in Jackson Civil Engineering to complete additional work on the busway before it was finally commissioned in August 2011.

    By September 2013, when Bam Nuttall agreed the previous payment, more than 5M journeys had been undertaken on the busway, reducing traffic levels on the parallel section of the A14.

    Bam Nuttall declined to comment on the latest report.
  2. forum rang 4 bammie 3 oktober 2014 13:34
    quote:

    manusolie schreef op 3 oktober 2014 13:24:

    [...]Dus geen vaststaande feit! Waarschijnlijk is BAM nog in onderhandeling met de claim-eiser.
    Zie onderstaand citaat:

    "The council has estimated costs of £5.3m for a fresh legal battle with BAM Nuttall over the latest problems, but hopes the dispute will not reach court."
  3. [verwijderd] 3 oktober 2014 13:36
    kijk weer op laag volume flink omlaag, nog wat speculatief nieuws er boven op want BAM moet en zal omlaag gedrukt worden. ik ga lekker weekend vieren neem mijn bammetjes lekker mee wat voor deze prijs krijgt niemand ze. BAM moet gewoon aantonen dat het beter gaat dan verstomd het geluid van de shorts en speculanten vanzelf, ik trek er zo wie zo een jaar voor uit. dit jaar is toch een overgangs jaar. als ze in 2018 maar een flink stuk hoger staan want dan heb ik de centen pas weer nodig
  4. forum rang 4 bartvde 3 oktober 2014 13:41
    quote:

    moneymaker schreef op 3 oktober 2014 13:40:

    ik vind het allemaal sneaky
    waar gaat die claim eigenlijk over dat is mij niet duidelijk
    daar staat er toch duidelijk? De claim gaat over een slechte oplevering van BAM met gebreken:

    Their report claimed:

    Shims and neoprene pads were put in without being fixed so they slip and cause movement of the beams
    Foundations were not deep enough as outlined in national guidelines on certain sections so they could move in the clay conditions
    Drainage is inadequate at two locations
    Joints between the guideway beams were too narrow to allow for thermal expansion of the beams
    Some bearings were out of position
    Some beams were not restrained enough by brackets so they move
    The council has been urged to begin a programme of works to rectify the problems, and to charge Bam Nuttall for this. Sections of the busway may need to be closed to carry out these works.
7.706 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 ... 386 »» | Laatste |Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met je emailadres en wachtwoord.

Direct naar Forum

Premium

Tegenvallers drukken resultaten BAM

Het laatste advies leest u als abonnee van IEX Premium

Inloggen Word Abonnee

Lees verder op het IEX netwerk Let op: Artikelen linken naar andere sites

Gesponsorde links