Van beleggers
voor beleggers
desktop iconMarkt Monitor
  • Word abonnee
  • Inloggen

    Inloggen

    • Geen account? Registreren

    Wachtwoord vergeten?

Ontvang nu dagelijks onze kooptips!

word abonnee

Weekdraadje 32 - 2011

74 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 2 3 4 »» | Laatste | Omlaag ↓
  1. forum rang 5 Ed Verbeek 6 augustus 2011 17:23
    quote:

    Bertus S schreef op 6 augustus 2011 14:10:

    [...]
    Klopt Ed, helemaal correct wat je schrijft.

    Dit x mijn fout dus!!

    Bertus S.

    P.S. visible is altijd per datum PB.
    klasse bertus, zo'n reactie

    alleen - ik durf het bijna niet te vragen - waar had een lezer van het PB kunnen vinden wat je in je P.S. schrijft? Ook Note 4 in het jaarverslag van 2010 (waar aan het eind van het PB naar verwezen wordt) zegt daar niets over.
  2. Bertus S 6 augustus 2011 17:41
    quote:

    Ed Verbeek schreef op 6 augustus 2011 17:23:

    [...]
    klasse bertus, zo'n reactie

    alleen - ik durf het bijna niet te vragen - waar had een lezer van het PB kunnen vinden wat je in je P.S. schrijft? Ook Note 4 in het jaarverslag van 2010 (waar aan het eind van het PB naar verwezen wordt) zegt daar niets over.
    Klopt, is gewoon een 'weetje' en wie met enige regelmaat de IBA bezoekt zal dit wsl kunnen beamen.

    Daarom wordt er ook geen datum (meer) genoemd bij het bekendmaken van de visible. Oftewel "as per date", is ooit ook eens genoemd in een TU.

    Bertus S.
  3. forum rang 5 Ed Verbeek 6 augustus 2011 21:07
    quote:

    Bertus S schreef op 6 augustus 2011 17:41:

    [...]
    Klopt, is gewoon een 'weetje' en wie met enige regelmaat de IBA bezoekt zal dit wsl kunnen beamen.
    oei, moet ik ook nog regelmatig naar de IBA gaan om de PB´s van soof niet verkeerd te interpreteren.
    ben ik even blij dat ik op dit forum zit waar frank daar voor ons navraag naar doet bij soof (http://www.iex.nl/Forum/Topic/1268183/1/Trading-Update-25-Juli-2011.aspx#5688004 ) en bertus dit soort ´weetjes´ al met ons deelt.
    Top.
  4. [verwijderd] 7 augustus 2011 10:31
    quote:

    smith&jones schreef op 6 augustus 2011 22:59:

    Voor mij ook heel verhelderend, vooral dat van die 'as per date visible'.

    Zo leer je nog eens wat...

    S&J.
    Het PB begon met:

    Sopheon plc, the international provider of software and services that improve the financial return from innovation and product development investments, issues the following trading update for the six months to 30 June 2011

    Redelijker wijze denk ik dan, tot en met 30 juni.

    Vervolgens gaat men verder met:

    In our Annual General Meeting announcement issued on 15 June we indicated that we had a substantial amount of business that we were working to close by the end of June.

    Waarna men verder gaat met:

    Much of this has concluded successfully, including some spill-over closed in the beginning of July

    En sluit men af:

    Accordingly, revenue visibility has risen to £7.8 million, from £6.6 million at the time of the Annual General Meeting.

    Accordingly, volgens mij "dienovereenkomstig"

    M.a.w meeste orders gesloten juni, maar ook enkele net begin juli, en derhalve "dienovereenkomstig" visible 7.8.

    Tsja. Maar hoe hadden de forum leden het dan graag vermeld zien staan?

    Gewoon 1e halfjaar tot en met 30 juni excl bedrag van begin juli?

    Frank.

  5. Bertus S 7 augustus 2011 12:47
    What is innovation management?

    July 26, 2011 - 9:04 am

    How do you measure success for innovation management processes?

    During a recent Sopheon Webinar broadcast, Phil Carlson, Vice-President for Business Development for Sopheon, shared a metrics-based business case model for senior executives, explaining the value to be gained from a structured approach to innovation. Attendees learned how many of today’s innovation leaders have invested in Sopheon’s Accolade software solution to help them increase top-line growth and make bottom-line improvements.

    What do you mean by “best practices”?

    The term “best practices” is quite often misunderstood. What it is NOT is a one-size fits all set of must-do’s that will guarantee success. Sopheon uses the term best practices to indicate (as Dr. Robert Cooper and his colleagues have documented) those key performance indicator (KPI) categories that have been proven to be associated with sustainable, high-performance product development. Think of it in terms of the relationship between strategy and tactics. Best practice new product development strategy includes consideration of such KPI categories as cross-funtional participation, more investment early in development, clear prioritization criteria, etc. The tactical HOW to address the KPI’s is very much situational for the specific company. The important thing is that identifying and incorporating best practice KPI’s into the development process helps an organization to put a framework in place that includes known influencers on successful business outcomes.

    Can you structure your process for a small company 10 or less people directly tied to NPD?

    Innovation processes can be scaled to meet the needs of both small and large organizations. The challenge is to manage to the key decisions that need to be made and to make sure that you are addressing those key issues. The rigor that you apply to this is dependent on the amount of risk that your organization is willing accept. For example, a small company may have a $1 million investment that is a “bet-the-farm” project. You absolutely need to do your homework because the risk associated with doing that project may threaten your company’s very existence. Conversely, the same $1 million investment may not be considered a large investment for a multibillion company. What is important is that the process and the tools used to manage these investments are scaled to reflect a company’s aversion to or endurance of business risk.

    What do you mean by “value”? Does this apply only to anticipated monetary returns?

    It’s been said that “beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.” The same principle applies to value. What one person finds valuable, another person does not. Only 33 percent of companies base their decisions solely on monetary metrics, such as ROI, NPV, or defined payback periods. The rest extend their definition of “value” to include risk tolerance and strategic impact. The right combination of all three components to value — their mission, shareholder expectations, and their ability to execute in competitive environments — is situational to each company; all must be taken into account. Sopheon strongly believes that gate scorecard criteria must reflect a company’s definition of value through well thought out articulation of what criteria is most important to that organization, as well as a particular KPI’s relative importance as part of the total, consensus score.

    Regarding, gate scoring: What organizational functions should have a vote in a gate score?

    High-performing businesses are twice as likely as low-performing businesses to employ cross-functional teams in generating gate scores. That said, what functions should be involved inside of any given company depends on the company’s organizational structure and who has a stake in the relative and ultimate success of a project. Typically, this includes nearly every function over the lifecycle of the product. Core functions that are always included are marketing, R&D / engineering, finance, supply chain, manufacturing operations, quality control, and legal. In certain instances, regulatory and/or clinical affairs may also be involved. Our recommendation is that creation of the gate score be driven at the project team level and that it be arrived at by consensus building.

    Do you find a different degree of complexity when developing products vs. services? Do the metrics change considerably?

    Each business model has its own complexities that need to be considered. However, we believe that the questions asked by senior management when making a decision are fairly standard across every company. Is it real? Is it worth it? Can we “win?” Accolade’s ease of configuration allows the client to use the metrics that matter most to them when answering these questions. For example, companies typically use net present value or a derivative thereof. If the margins or costs associated with a project or group of projects doesn’t change substantially, senior executives may only look at top-line sales. Another possible consideration would be the amount of risk associated with the likelihood of technical and/or commercial success of a proposed product or products. Once you get beyond such top-line measurements, the key performance indicators do vary from business to business, and even within businesses of the same type, to reflect a company’s unique strategy and business goals. Bottom line, both product companies AND service companies can benefit immensely by better managing their innovation processes.

    How long does it take to implement your solution? And how long does it typically take to make a cultural change in fully adopting a new process / tool?

    Typically, an Accolade implementation requires between 10 and 14 weeks, depending on the state of readiness in the client’s environment. Some factors that come into play include the maturity of the client’s product development process; how much training is required and how the company plans to rollout our tool; and whether or not the customer requires any customization of Accolade to better meet their company’s specific needs (i.e. new Accolade reporting screens, additional functionality, and/or integration with existing applications, like ERP systems). Sopheon’s implementation process follows a Stage-Gate® methodology, beginning with creating the configuration blueprint, then moving to first and second iterations of the Accolade configuration in a test server environment, and finally moving to the production server along with rollout to the user population.
    As to the second part of your question, cultural change is a complex issue with no simple answer. Sopheon has found that by consistently using Accolade, our clients have been able to aid in speeding process adoption and thus, reap the benefits of better decision-making, such as increased revenues from new products and reduced time-to-market. But in order for any development process (and the related implementation of tools like Accolade) to be successful, it requires commitment from top management to really change the way that projects are prioritized and the way that decisions are made. One thing is for certain: Accolade provides a platform for both management and professional staff to build trust in each other. By giving both groups visibility to the status of key projects, Accolade can help your entire organization stay focused on achieving the desired business outcomes you seek.

    Bron: whatisinnovationmanagement.acareerina...

    Bertus S.
  6. forum rang 5 Ed Verbeek 7 augustus 2011 16:33
    quote:

    Theophiel schreef op 7 augustus 2011 10:31:

    [...]
    M.a.w meeste orders gesloten juni, maar ook enkele net begin juli, en derhalve "dienovereenkomstig" visible 7.8.

    Tsja. Maar hoe hadden de forum leden het dan graag vermeld zien staan?

    Gewoon 1e halfjaar tot en met 30 juni excl bedrag van begin juli?

    Frank.
    ach frank, gewoon het woordje "now" tussen "has risen" was al genoeg geweest.
    Of "as per date" zoals bertus hierboven al suggereerde.
    Kleine moeite toch?

    Dan was ook jij niet op het verkeerde been gezet door dit PB.
    Immers, ook jij ging er vanuit dat de visibility van 7.8 per 30 juni gold,
    getuige wat je schreef in www.iex.nl/Forum/Topic/1268183/Sopheo... op 25 jul 2011 om 13:50:
    "De 7.8 ( ga ik vanuit) is tot en met eind juni.
    Begin juli zijn er nog contracten afgesloten, en dat bedrag komt dan weer al bovenop die 7.8.
    "

    en had je daarover ook geen mailtje hoeven te sturen aan soof waarvoor je als reden opgaf:
    "dan weet ik het zeker in plaats van dat we het raden er naar hebben." (in idem om 17:53)
  7. [verwijderd] 7 augustus 2011 17:15
    quote:

    Ed Verbeek schreef op 7 augustus 2011 16:33:

    [...]

    Dan was ook jij niet op het verkeerde been gezet door dit PB.

    * Dat is juist, men begon dan ook met:

    the following trading update for the six months to 30 June 2011.

    en had je daarover ook geen mailtje hoeven te sturen aan soof waarvoor je als reden opgaf:
    "dan weet ik het zeker in plaats van dat we het raden er naar hebben." (in idem om 17:53)

    * Dat mailtje heb ik gestuurd meer voor het forum dan voor mijzelf, immers blijkens de reacties wist iedereen het achteraf het beste.

    Of men laat eerst een ander reageren, en valt dan bij, dat komt ook voor natuurlijk.

  8. forum rang 5 Ed Verbeek 7 augustus 2011 17:43
    quote:

    smith&jones schreef op 7 augustus 2011 17:13:

    Het valt Frank niet echt aan te rekenen, het is gewoon een beetje raar geformuleerd door Soof, en dat weten ze best daar...

    S&J.
    nee zeg, het frank aanrekenen is wel het laatste wat ik wil
    ik twijfel er niet aan dat de volgende keer dit 'foutje' door soof niet meer wordt gemaakt.

  9. smith&jones 7 augustus 2011 18:27
    hmm, lijkt me niet waarschijnlijk eerlijk gezegd.
    Misschien niet dit specifieke foutje, maar de vertrouwde combi cryptisch geformuleerde ( slechte) cijfers en gloedvolle outlook en dito pipeline zal m.i. blijven. Sorry dat ik het zo zeg....

    'There are some areas of concern that we may see addressed when its interim report is issued on 25 August.'

    Benieuwd wat Soof gaat melden

    S&J.
  10. [verwijderd] 7 augustus 2011 19:33
    quote:

    smith&jones schreef op 7 augustus 2011 18:27:

    hmm, lijkt me niet waarschijnlijk eerlijk gezegd.
    Misschien niet dit specifieke foutje, maar de vertrouwde combi cryptisch geformuleerde ( slechte) cijfers en gloedvolle outlook en dito pipeline zal m.i. blijven. Sorry dat ik het zo zeg....

    'There are some areas of concern that we may see addressed when its interim report is issued on 25 August.'

    Benieuwd wat Soof gaat melden

    S&J.
    ff voor mij want ik kan het blijkbaar de laatste tijd niet goed volgen: waar stond

    'There are some areas of concern that we may see addressed when its interim report is issued on 25 August.'

    in het pb van j.l. juli.

    Merci.
  11. smith&jones 7 augustus 2011 19:43
    Haha, onderaan je openingsbericht Frank, niet het PB van Soof zelf.

    daarbij haal je een eerder door Bertus gepost bericht aan...

    S&J.

    PS nu doe ik zelf ook al mee aan het herhalen van berichten... Jullie laten me diep zinken hier ;-)

    Bertus S 31 jul 2011 om 21:22

    Monday 25th July 2011

    Sopheon closes deals, raises revenue visibility

    Cautious customers did close on a set of business deals that Sopheon had high hopes for but with some spilling over into July they missed the H1 cut-off, which is partly why Sopheon’s H1 revenue is expected to be similar to last year. Higher staffing levels have also taken their toll. However, revenue visibility, which was reported as being up in a pre-AGM trading update last month, has been raised again from $6.6m to $7.8m

    Sopheon’s overall performance has been positive but there are some areas of concern that we may see addressed when its interim report is issued on 25 August. While it looks like H1 revenues will essentially and be flat and EBITDA is expected to be lower (due to staff increases), Sopheon says its sales pipeline is strong, so the company has a good basis for further improvement.

    Posted by Angela Eager at 07:16

    www.techmarketview.com/ukhotviews

    Bertus S 3 aug 2011 om 19:43
    www.fbo.gov/?s=opportunity&mode=f...
  12. smith&jones 7 augustus 2011 19:53
    PS goed mogelijk dat de Euro crisis gunstig is voor de koers van het GBP. Dat zou de resulktaten van Soof wel een steun in de rug kunnen geven in H2... zomaar een gedachte.

    Wel moet alles steeds in het perspectief van het gigantische aantal uitstaande aandelen gezet worden...

    S&J.
  13. [verwijderd] 7 augustus 2011 19:58
    quote:

    smith&jones schreef op 7 augustus 2011 19:43:

    Haha, onderaan je openingsbericht Frank, niet het PB van Soof zelf.

    daarbij haal je een eerder door Bertus gepost bericht aan...

    S&J.

    PS nu doe ik zelf ook al mee aan het herhalen van berichten... Jullie laten me diep zinken hier ;-)

    Bertus S 31 jul 2011 om 21:22

    Monday 25th July 2011

    Sopheon closes deals, raises revenue visibility

    Cautious customers did close on a set of business deals that Sopheon had high hopes for but with some spilling over into July they missed the H1 cut-off, which is partly why Sopheon’s H1 revenue is expected to be similar to last year. Higher staffing levels have also taken their toll. However, revenue visibility, which was reported as being up in a pre-AGM trading update last month, has been raised again from $6.6m to $7.8m

    Sopheon’s overall performance has been positive but there are some areas of concern that we may see addressed when its interim report is issued on 25 August. While it looks like H1 revenues will essentially and be flat and EBITDA is expected to be lower (due to staff increases), Sopheon says its sales pipeline is strong, so the company has a good basis for further improvement.

    Posted by Angela Eager at 07:16

    www.techmarketview.com/ukhotviews

    Bertus S 3 aug 2011 om 19:43
    www.fbo.gov/?s=opportunity&mode=f...

    Gelukkig gaf ik zelf al aan dat ik het niet meer kan volgen.
    Bedankt voor het antwoord.
    Het is toch wat he, een PB van hooguit 10 regels, en we hebben er met talloze personen weken werk aan. (lol)

    Frank.
  14. forum rang 5 Ed Verbeek 7 augustus 2011 21:01
    quote:

    Bertus S schreef op 7 augustus 2011 12:47:

    What is innovation management?

    July 26, 2011 - 9:04 am

    How do you measure success for innovation management processes?

    During a recent Sopheon Webinar broadcast, Phil Carlson, Vice-President for Business Development for Sopheon, shared a metrics-based business case model for senior executives, explaining the value to be gained from a structured approach to innovation. Attendees learned how many of today’s innovation leaders have invested in Sopheon’s Accolade software solution to help them increase top-line growth and make bottom-line improvements.

    What do you mean by “best practices”?

    The term “best practices” is quite often misunderstood. What it is NOT is a one-size fits all set of must-do’s that will guarantee success. Sopheon uses the term best practices to indicate (as Dr. Robert Cooper and his colleagues have documented) those key performance indicator (KPI) categories that have been proven to be associated with sustainable, high-performance product development. Think of it in terms of the relationship between strategy and tactics. Best practice new product development strategy includes consideration of such KPI categories as cross-funtional participation, more investment early in development, clear prioritization criteria, etc. The tactical HOW to address the KPI’s is very much situational for the specific company. The important thing is that identifying and incorporating best practice KPI’s into the development process helps an organization to put a framework in place that includes known influencers on successful business outcomes.

    Can you structure your process for a small company 10 or less people directly tied to NPD?

    Innovation processes can be scaled to meet the needs of both small and large organizations. The challenge is to manage to the key decisions that need to be made and to make sure that you are addressing those key issues. The rigor that you apply to this is dependent on the amount of risk that your organization is willing accept. For example, a small company may have a $1 million investment that is a “bet-the-farm” project. You absolutely need to do your homework because the risk associated with doing that project may threaten your company’s very existence. Conversely, the same $1 million investment may not be considered a large investment for a multibillion company. What is important is that the process and the tools used to manage these investments are scaled to reflect a company’s aversion to or endurance of business risk.

    What do you mean by “value”? Does this apply only to anticipated monetary returns?

    It’s been said that “beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.” The same principle applies to value. What one person finds valuable, another person does not. Only 33 percent of companies base their decisions solely on monetary metrics, such as ROI, NPV, or defined payback periods. The rest extend their definition of “value” to include risk tolerance and strategic impact. The right combination of all three components to value — their mission, shareholder expectations, and their ability to execute in competitive environments — is situational to each company; all must be taken into account. Sopheon strongly believes that gate scorecard criteria must reflect a company’s definition of value through well thought out articulation of what criteria is most important to that organization, as well as a particular KPI’s relative importance as part of the total, consensus score.

    Regarding, gate scoring: What organizational functions should have a vote in a gate score?

    High-performing businesses are twice as likely as low-performing businesses to employ cross-functional teams in generating gate scores. That said, what functions should be involved inside of any given company depends on the company’s organizational structure and who has a stake in the relative and ultimate success of a project. Typically, this includes nearly every function over the lifecycle of the product. Core functions that are always included are marketing, R&D / engineering, finance, supply chain, manufacturing operations, quality control, and legal. In certain instances, regulatory and/or clinical affairs may also be involved. Our recommendation is that creation of the gate score be driven at the project team level and that it be arrived at by consensus building.

    Do you find a different degree of complexity when developing products vs. services? Do the metrics change considerably?

    Each business model has its own complexities that need to be considered. However, we believe that the questions asked by senior management when making a decision are fairly standard across every company. Is it real? Is it worth it? Can we “win?” Accolade’s ease of configuration allows the client to use the metrics that matter most to them when answering these questions. For example, companies typically use net present value or a derivative thereof. If the margins or costs associated with a project or group of projects doesn’t change substantially, senior executives may only look at top-line sales. Another possible consideration would be the amount of risk associated with the likelihood of technical and/or commercial success of a proposed product or products. Once you get beyond such top-line measurements, the key performance indicators do vary from business to business, and even within businesses of the same type, to reflect a company’s unique strategy and business goals. Bottom line, both product companies AND service companies can benefit immensely by better managing their innovation processes.

    How long does it take to implement your solution? And how long does it typically take to make a cultural change in fully adopting a new process / tool?

    Typically, an Accolade implementation requires between 10 and 14 weeks, depending on the state of readiness in the client’s environment. Some factors that come into play include the maturity of the client’s product development process; how much training is required and how the company plans to rollout our tool; and whether or not the customer requires any customization of Accolade to better meet their company’s specific needs (i.e. new Accolade reporting screens, additional functionality, and/or integration with existing applications, like ERP systems). Sopheon’s implementation process follows a Stage-Gate® methodology, beginning with creating the configuration blueprint, then moving to first and second iterations of the Accolade configuration in a test server environment, and finally moving to the production server along with rollout to the user population.
    [...]
    achieving the desired business outcomes you seek.

    Bron: whatisinnovationmanagement.acareerina...

    Bertus S.
    hoe heb je het weer gevonden bertus

    het artikel stond welliswaar al op 25 augustus 2006 op de site van sopheon
    (zie www.sopheon.com/NEWSEVENTS/inKNOWvati... )
    maar het kan nooit kwaad om positief nieuws over sopheon ook 5 jaar later nog eens te herhalen
    en het is natuurlijk interessant om te zien dat het nu ook op deze eigenaardige site over een carriere in de accountancy staat.
74 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 2 3 4 »» | Laatste |Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met je emailadres en wachtwoord.

Direct naar Forum

Indices

AEX 913,39 +0,30%
EUR/USD 1,0880 +0,58%
FTSE 100 8.445,80 +0,21%
Germany40^ 18.867,90 +0,81%
Gold spot 2.385,28 +1,16%
NY-Nasdaq Composite 16.511,18 +0,75%

Stijgers

INPOST
+6,22%
NX FIL...
+6,15%
JDE PE...
+4,86%
WDP
+4,26%
ASMI
+2,87%

Dalers

ABN AM...
-6,11%
AMG Cr...
-3,25%
Air Fr...
-3,06%
Fugro
-2,30%
Pharming
-2,07%

Lees verder op het IEX netwerk Let op: Artikelen linken naar andere sites

Gesponsorde links