Inloggen

Login
 
Wachtwoord vergeten?

De hype cycle van self-driving cars

Volgen
 
Klik hier om dit forumtopic te volgen en automatisch op de hoogte gehouden te worden bij nieuwe berichten.
3.675 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 » | Laatste
Aantal posts per pagina:  20 50 100 | Omlaag ↓
Tom3
1
Tomtom wordt hier expliciet genoemd bij de mapping partners van Nvidia:

www.reuters.com/article/us-nvidia-sel...

Wellicht kunnen die andere amateurs nu opzouten
Beperktedijkbewaking
0
Hoe moet ik dit kopiëren?
Men zei:

Fluids do not need to be “instructed”on where to flow - they automatically take the path of least resistance. Drivers on the other hand, may not be aware of alternate paths of lower “resistance”. Therefore, real-time tools (such as WAZE) are available to help provide that information.

Ik zei:

Fluids do not take the path of least resistance. They experience turbulence, which is in fact the most important resistance in the macroscopic real-life motion of fluids.
Believe me, I studied -as a physicist- the transition from turbulent friction to viscous friction in detail. Up to the limit of our measuring instruments.
Fluids are not ‘smart’. Neither is Waze. They follow the turbulent waves. Only TT’s Schaeffer knows to model these waves, and to incorporate it in his predictive models.



Dat is wat ik zei, en wat ik geloof. Wie TT wil overnemen moet Schaeffer overnemen.
Wie kan zonder hem? Ja, Google+Waze, maar minder predictive.
Zij zijn als Facebook, levend bij het moment, en na ons de zondvloed. Schaeffer weet precies wat de invloed van x% probes is. Hij zegt het nu al, zie vroegere posts van mij.

Er is hoop bij alle discussies rond Facebook. Als het om traffic gaat, heet die hoop Schaeffer.

PS. Ik heb geen facebook-account. Nooit gehad, en heb het ook nooit gemist, Behalve bij de EO, waar onze schijnheilige broeder Tijs vd Brink zweert bij Facebook, en anders onbereikbaar is.
Mijn alias verraadt enig 'mannnenbroederschap'. Tijs koketteert met het geloof, maar verraadt het intussen...

apollo
1
pwijsneus
1
Why GM and Waymo Rely on Allies in Self-Driving Race

The two leaders in autonomous vehicles get by with a lot of help from their friends.

By
David Welch and Mark Bergen
1 juni 2018 12:00 CEST Bloomberg’s Hyperdrive


An automaker like General Motors Co. brings two advantages to the development of self-driving vehicles: knowledge of how to build a car and the factories to do it.

Silicon Valley’s biggest entrants into autonomous vehicles, particularly Alphabet Inc., have legions of coders and piles of cash.

Now GM and Alphabet have found someone else to handle the aspects of this historic undertaking that the companies are least adept at doing themselves.

Carmakers hate risking billions of dollars more than they do already to compete in a low-margin industry, and so SoftBank stepped forward on Thursday to drop $2.25 billion into GM’s Cruise Automation unit. That will help finance the rollout of a driverless ride-hailing business next year. Google’s parent company doesn’t run factories, and so on Thursday the tech giant agreed to buy tens of thousands of minivans made by Fiat Chrysler. The vehicles will be outfitted with autonomous systems designed by Alphabet’s Waymo unit.

“They both need to invest in these technologies but they won't get a return for years,” said Eric Noble, president of the CarLab, a consulting firm in Orange, California. “Right now Waymo doesn't need to build their own cars, and GM can spend $2 billion on vehicles that make money.”

The decision by SoftBank Vision Fund to buy nearly 20 percent of GM Cruise Holdings is a significant coup for the Detroit automaker. This is a company that pulled out of big car markets like Europe, Russia and India because the cash spent on new models there provided little return or losses.

Self-driving cars cost a fortune without generating any revenue at the moment, and GM Chief Executive Officer Mary Barra doesn't want to invest in anything that falls short of her push for 10 percent operating margins. Money is less of a constraint for Waymo and its parent company, which has more than $100 billion in cash.

GM was already spending $1 billion a year to fund Cruise and, as part of the SoftBank deal, has moved to put in another $1.1 billion. Getting someone else to share the burden is a big help, and the huge tech investor also has stakes in ride-hailing giants Uber and Didi, opening the possibility of new alliances.
“You can't go it alone in autonomy”

pwijsneus
0
(deel 2)

SoftBank approached the automaker and did exhaustive technological research before putting pen to paper on a deal, said a person familiar with the matter. While GM doesn't necessarily need the cash, the company's executives figured that bringing on SoftBank would represent a ringing endorsement in the tech world. In addition to backing a slate of ride-hailing startups, SoftBank has invested in two chipmakers supplying many autonomous efforts: Nvidia and ARM Holdings.

“SoftBank validates what Cruise has been doing,” said Grayson Brulte, co-founder of Brulte & Co., a consulting firm that specializes in autonomous strategy. That's important, he added, because some in Silicon Valley see old industrial companies as dinosaurs driven by cautious engineers, not entrepreneurs.

Buying Cruise for $581 million in cash two years ago was GM’s way of catching up to Silicon Valley in the rush to bring artificial intelligence to cars, and the value of the San Francisco-based startup has been on the rise ever since. Adding in bonuses and other payments to key employees, the acquisition by GM was said to have cost closer to $1 billion. SoftBank's investment values Cruise at $11.5 billion today.

“GM will obviously have the majority of the capital in Cruise,” said Michael Ronen, managing partner of SoftBank Investment Advisers. “The sale and the fact that there is an acquaintance should help make an introduction.”
While GM took in billions of dollars, Waymo moved to get more cars. The latest deal with Fiat could end up expanding Waymo’s existing fleet of Chrysler Pacifica minivans a hundredfold. The new vehicles will form the backbone of a driverless ride-hailing service, which is slated to debut later this year.

Questions remain about the timeline for expansion. A statement released Thursday said Waymo would buy “up to” 62,000 vehicles, without details on when. A fleet that size would be large enough to offer a scaled ride-hailing service in two to three markets, according to one industry insider.

John Krafcik, Waymo's CEO, has a favorite catchphrase: “We're not building cars; we're building better drivers.” The slogan is a sales pitch for Waymo's package of software and sensors, which many experts characterize as the best in class. It’s also a dog-whistle to the car industry—a way to dampen concerns that Alphabet, the world's third largest company, is planning to manufacture its own vehicles.

That has left Waymo to create a fleet for its futuristic driverless business using existing vehicle models such as the Chrysler Pacifica and the Jaguar I-Pace. For now, at least, Waymo integrates its software into cars designed with gasoline engines and a driver in mind. GM uses a modified version of its own Chevrolet Bolt, an electric car that has more power on board to handle the intensive computing requirement. The version used by Cruise in current road tests is a third-generation car that will eventually have the steering wheel and pedals removed.

A new test of Waymo’s strategy of relying on partners to make cars could come soon. Krafcik has said a pending deal between Waymo and Honda, will produce an entirely new vehicle designed for use in a driverless business. But that new vehicle hasn't surfaced in the almost year and a half since the companies announced their talks.

For years before the project was re-branded as Waymo, Google weighed the option of making its own cars and even produced a prototype. Ultimately, Google's co-founders opted to work with existing carmakers. In 2015, shortly after Krafcik joined, Waymo tried to cut a major deal with Ford. He told Bloomberg News earlier this year that the talks collapsed when Alphabet decided it bore too much capital risk in the arrangement.

Part of Waymo’s announcement on Thursday included a pledge to sell self-driving cars for private ownership, something GM hasn’t yet discussed. The technology is still extremely expensive, and some experts doubt ownership will be competitive with ride-hailing services built on driverless vehicles. “By the time personal car ownership is feasible, it won't be desirable,” said Anne Widera, a self-driving consultant who has worked at Waymo and Uber. Selling cars outfitted with self-driving sensors would also risk that the intellectual property on board could be copied.

In a way, Waymo’s tactic of finding someone else to make its cars fits the classic mold of its parent business: controlling the valuable artificial intelligence and data running through self-driving cars, without making the hardware. That may change, though, as parts of Alphabet's empire have recently shifted toward creating more hardware—Google's own gadgets and cloud-computing chips, as well as Waymo's sensors—to exert more control over the product.

For GM, on the other hand, seeking a partner with deep pockets is consistent with its established practice of not risking billions in cash on profits that are years away. Both leaders in self-driving cars are sticking to what they already know and getting help from others.

“You can't go it alone in autonomy,” said Brulte. “It’s too expensive and only a few players even have the capabilities.”
pwijsneus
1
Bloomberg heeft ook "zijn eigen draad" omtrent het zelfsturende gebeuren, en het veruimd de blik van wat er in de gehele markt gebeurt in plaats van alle deze TomTom postzegel:

Bloomberg's Hyperdrive: www.bloomberg.com/hyperdrive

Voor de mensen die wat meer in depth willen gaan.

Hier nog eentje;

Cadillac’s Super Cruise maps are key to our robotaxi future
The better the map, the smarter the self-driving car.

Cadillac's Super Cruise = GM

www.engadget.com/2017/10/10/cadillac-...

vCalker
1
"THE race to bring driverless cars to market is fierce and crowded. All the leading carmakers are in the field: on May 31st SoftBank’s Vision Fund said that it would invest $2.25bn in the autonomous vehicle (AV) arm of General Motors. So are tech upstarts, from Uber to Tesla to Waymo, Alphabet’s self-drive division and the leader in driverless technology, which recently announced plans to add 62,000 minivans to the fleet of cars that will make up its autonomous ride-hailing service. Intense competition has both benefits and costs, but will probably prove short-lived. Thanks to powerful economies of scale, the roads may soon be ruled by no more than a handful of firms."


www.economist.com/finance-and-economi...
Gijsie
1
Dit linkje is alweer bijna een jaar oud, maar ik vind deze site altijd erg informatief en Brad lijkt me een integere vent:
ideas.4brad.com/many-different-approa...
Gijsie
1
Zelfrijdende auto misschien toch wat later dan gedacht:
www.theverge.com/2018/7/3/17530232/se...

Dit is geen slechte ontwikkeling voor TomTom. TomTom gokt meer op een geleidelijke invoering van zelfrijdende technologie, waarbij dat op de snelwegen als eerste ingevoerd wordt.
3.675 Posts, Pagina: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 » | Laatste
Aantal posts per pagina:  20 50 100 | Omhoog ↑

Plaats een reactie

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met je emailadres en wachtwoord

Direct naar Forum

TomTom Meer »

Koers 9,843   Verschil -0,25 (-2,45%)
Laag 9,828   Volume 565.302
Hoog 10,096   Gem. Volume 782.139
18-okt-19 16:54
label premium

TomTom: Reality check

Het laatste advies leest u als IEX Premium-lid

Inloggen Ontdek Premium