Ontvang nu dagelijks onze kooptips!
word abonnee
sluiten ✕
Terug naar discussie overzicht
Bij opening toch even afscheid genomen. 78.75. Voelde me er niet prettig bij, winst insluiten en even op de zijlijn staan
Mellowtwo schreef op 25 oktober 2021 09:13 :
Bij opening toch even afscheid genomen. 78.75.
Voelde me er niet prettig bij, winst insluiten en even op de zijlijn staan
Van winstnemen is nog nooit iemand armer geworden ;-)
Stefanus: bij Corona in China, is dit voor Prosus toch geen risico, hun leven juist van online. Of zie ik iets over het hoofd?
paul belegt echt. schreef op 25 oktober 2021 10:50 :
Stefanus: bij Corona in China, is dit voor Prosus toch geen risico, hun leven juist van online. Of zie ik iets over het hoofd?
Kan het sentiment verslechteren in de Chinese markt. Vooral bij een neergaande economische groei werkt dit door in de aandelenkoersen. Als China massaal in lockdown gaat verwacht ik wel dat we hiervan gevolgen gaan zien. Prosus zit natuurlijk naast China in nog meer markten waar de vaccinatie graad niet altijd top is.
Mellowtwo schreef op 25 oktober 2021 09:13 :
Bij opening toch even afscheid genomen. 78.75.
Voelde me er niet prettig bij, winst insluiten en even op de zijlijn staan
Hier idem. Calls gesloten. RSI schurkte tegen de 70. In korte tijd van rond 66 naar 79. Verwacht komende dagen een terugval ivm onveranderde situatie. Op later tijdstip weer instappen....
Op dit moment Tencent min 0,88 en Prosus min 1,60
Overtrokken koersbeweging Prosus. ADR Tencent blijft prima liggen. DH is ook niet extreem gedaald.
kan deze ook niet plaatsen. Tencent -0,88% ADR tencent net even in de plus. En prosus weer van een klif(je) af . Iemand een idee, anders dan negatief sentiment?
Prosus krijgt een tikkie vandaag. Mijn investering in electrische auto s(China) doen het prima vandaag? Kan morgen weer anders zijn.
Prosus is weer het kneusje van de aex. Maar eigenlijk was vanochtend al te zien dat prosus vandaag stapje voor stapje lager zou gaan. Wanneer komt die flink upswing nou bij tencent?Zodat prosus eindelijk weer richting de 85-90 kan gaan en dus definitief afscheid neemt van de 7x regionen
Wauwie, een tegendraads Prosus, i.e. korting to the max.
Avondmens schreef op 25 oktober 2021 16:52 :
kan deze ook niet plaatsen. Tencent -0,88% ADR tencent net even in de plus. En prosus weer van een klif(je) af . Iemand een idee, anders dan negatief sentiment?
Heeft te maken met stemming rond maaltijdbezorgers ,zie justeat takeaway
Een grote verkoper die met beleid stukken dumpt. Het gaat namelijk om de gemiddelde verkoopprijs waar een verkoper voor gaat.
Brimily schreef op 25 oktober 2021 17:31 :
[...]
Heeft te maken met stemming rond maaltijdbezorgers ,zie justeat takeaway
Nah, met -2,21 betekent dat de waardering voor maaltijdzorging volledig uit Prosus verdampt is.
Inderdaad een hele slechte dag. Morgen dan maar weer up!
Avondmens schreef op 25 oktober 2021 16:52 :
kan deze ook niet plaatsen. Tencent -0,88% ADR tencent net even in de plus. En prosus weer van een klif(je) af . Iemand een idee, anders dan negatief sentiment?
Naspers flink omlaag in Zuid-Afrika dat is de reden.
Naspers en Prosus zitten aan elkaar vast.
dreeel een van een verhaal gepubliceerd op 18-10-21 Why Tencent Is a Better Buy Than Alibaba CONTRIBUTOR Billy Duberstein The Motley Fool PUBLISHED OCT 18, 2021 6:50AM EDT All-new World Reimagined podcast Listen Now The Chinese internet giants have been incredible wealth-creators over the past 20 years. Yet this summer, China's tech darlings fell hard -- as in more than 50% hard -- as the Communist Party's regulatory regime cracked down on the sector in a big way. Now that these stocks are deeply discounted, some may view the sell-off as a golden buying opportunity. Count Warren Buffett's longtime business partner, Charlie Munger, as one of them, as Munger increased his massive bet on e-commerce leader Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) over the summer. Alibaba has been a popular way for American investors to gain exposure to Chinese tech, but I'd argue Alibaba rival Tencent (OTC: TCEHY) is actually the better way to play a Chinese rebound, for the following reasons. Young woman holds up phone and reflections of her screen fly around it in the air. Image source: Getty Images. No. 1: Diversity of revenue and profit streams In such an uncertain regulatory environment, a company's diversity and resilience is paramount. This is one of the fundamental reasons to like Tencent over Alibaba. The former has a fairly even distribution of revenue; last quarter, Tencent received 31% of revenue from video games, 30% of revenue from its fintech and cloud services segment, 21% from social networks services and subscriptions, and 17% from online advertising. Promoted Links Footage of man beating wife to death on Chinese street sparks outrage De buzz rond Bitcoin: waarom 2021 wel eens het jaar kan worden om te investeren eToro 3 Altcoins That Could Outpace Bitcoin in the Coming Years British actress Helen McCrory has died, husband Damian Lewis says That's nice diversity, and while Tencent doesn't break down the profitability of each segment, global peers in video games, social media, and digital payments tend to be highly profitable. So while recent regulatory actions against video game addiction among youths rattled investors this summer, any one regulation is less likely to hurt Tencent's overall business when compared with Alibaba. That's because Alibaba gets a much greater proportion of its overall revenue from e-commerce. Last quarter, 87% of Alibaba's revenue came from its e-commerce empire. Although there is a lot of diversity within that general e-commerce basket, the vast majority of Alibaba's business still comes from selling items to people over the internet. More concerning, only 39% of revenue is from the "core" customer management segment, which is essentially highly profitable online advertising. And while Alibaba's overall revenue growth was 34% last quarter, the profitable customer management segment grew only 14%. The remaining 48% of Alibaba's e-commerce revenue is loss-making, generating an EBITA loss of 14 billion yuan for Alibaba last quarter. While it's true that these segments across direct sales, wholesale, grocery, international e-commerce, and logistics grew at a faster rate than core customer management, it's still unclear what kind of profit margins those segments will have at maturity. They'll probably be less profitable than the core online advertising business.
deel twee All-new World Reimagined podcast Listen Now The Chinese internet giants have been incredible wealth-creators over the past 20 years. Yet this summer, China's tech darlings fell hard -- as in more than 50% hard -- as the Communist Party's regulatory regime cracked down on the sector in a big way. Now that these stocks are deeply discounted, some may view the sell-off as a golden buying opportunity. Count Warren Buffett's longtime business partner, Charlie Munger, as one of them, as Munger increased his massive bet on e-commerce leader Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) over the summer. Alibaba has been a popular way for American investors to gain exposure to Chinese tech, but I'd argue Alibaba rival Tencent (OTC: TCEHY) is actually the better way to play a Chinese rebound, for the following reasons. Young woman holds up phone and reflections of her screen fly around it in the air. Image source: Getty Images. No. 1: Diversity of revenue and profit streams In such an uncertain regulatory environment, a company's diversity and resilience is paramount. This is one of the fundamental reasons to like Tencent over Alibaba. The former has a fairly even distribution of revenue; last quarter, Tencent received 31% of revenue from video games, 30% of revenue from its fintech and cloud services segment, 21% from social networks services and subscriptions, and 17% from online advertising. Promoted Links Footage of man beating wife to death on Chinese street sparks outrage De buzz rond Bitcoin: waarom 2021 wel eens het jaar kan worden om te investeren eToro 3 Altcoins That Could Outpace Bitcoin in the Coming Years British actress Helen McCrory has died, husband Damian Lewis says That's nice diversity, and while Tencent doesn't break down the profitability of each segment, global peers in video games, social media, and digital payments tend to be highly profitable. So while recent regulatory actions against video game addiction among youths rattled investors this summer, any one regulation is less likely to hurt Tencent's overall business when compared with Alibaba. That's because Alibaba gets a much greater proportion of its overall revenue from e-commerce. Last quarter, 87% of Alibaba's revenue came from its e-commerce empire. Although there is a lot of diversity within that general e-commerce basket, the vast majority of Alibaba's business still comes from selling items to people over the internet. More concerning, only 39% of revenue is from the "core" customer management segment, which is essentially highly profitable online advertising. And while Alibaba's overall revenue growth was 34% last quarter, the profitable customer management segment grew only 14%. The remaining 48% of Alibaba's e-commerce revenue is loss-making, generating an EBITA loss of 14 billion yuan for Alibaba last quarter. While it's true that these segments across direct sales, wholesale, grocery, international e-commerce, and logistics grew at a faster rate than core customer management, it's still unclear what kind of profit margins those segments will have at maturity. They'll probably be less profitable than the core online advertising business. With a huge concentration in e-commerce, Alibaba's business is more vulnerable to any one particular regulation than Tencent might be amid this crackdown. In fact, recent new rules may already affect Alibaba's future results. In April, China's regulator fined Alibaba $2.8 billion for forcing vendors into exclusivity arrangements, and Alibaba will now stop the practice. That could leave it more vulnerable to competition, now that ascendant e-commerce players such as JD.com (NASDAQ: JD), Pinduoduo (NASDAQ: PDD), and Meituan (OTC: MPNGF) will have access to the same vendors. No. 2: Tencent has better non-China assets and investments Aside from each company's core business, both companies also invest their profits into outside businesses, and both now have impressive investment portfolios. However, Tencent's is much larger, with stakes in significant non-Chinese companies such as Tesla, Snap, Activision Blizzard, and Universal Music Group. Tencent's most successful non-China investment is perhaps its roughly 25% stake in Sea Limited, which appears to be taking market share from Alibaba-owned Lazada in Southeast Asia -- though both Southeast Asian e-commerce companies are growing nicely. In all, Tencent's investment portfolio totaled more than $224 billion as of June 30. While some of those investments in China, including JD.com, Pinduoduo, and Meituan (all backed by Tencent) and others are probably down since then, Tencent's international holdings have done much better. By contrast, Alibaba's total investments were about $83 billion as of June 30, according to the company's balance sheet. That may be a bit low in reality, considering Alibaba owns 33% of Ant Financial, which many financial firms value in the $140 billion to $200 billion range after its scrapped IPO last year. So Alibaba's share in Ant alone could be between $45 billion and $65 billion. Still, Alibaba's investment portfolio is much smaller than Tencent's and also offers less diversification outside China. In addition, Tencent has an unfair advantage over Alibaba in nurturing its investee companies. That's because Tencent is the owner of Chinese super-app WeChat, which logged just over 1.25 billion users as of last quarter. By being able to invest in companies and then promote them on WeChat, Tencent can give its investees instant exposure and an advantage that Alibaba might not be able to match.
deel drie Alibaba might not be able to match. No. 3: Better standing with regulators Finally, another Tencent advantage goes back to the start of the regulatory campaign, which began when Alibaba founder Jack Ma criticized the country's primarily state-owned banking system for its lack of innovation. We all know what happened next. Regulators scrapped Alibaba-owned Ant Financial's IPO, and it looks as though Chinese authorities will break Ant up into three parts, with state-backed companies also taking a stake in each. In contrast, Tencent seems to have an excellent relationship with regulators, and CEO Pony Ma has a considerably lower public profile than Jack Ma does. While regulators also fined Tencent for some anticompetitive practices -- though mostly within investees such as Tencent Music (NYSE: TME), not its core business -- those fines were lower than Alibaba's, even though Tencent had a larger market cap. Tencent has also traditionally taken a conservative route to monetizing its platforms, including WeChat and emerging products such as its new enterprise cloud software products. That's likely to keep regulators relatively at bay. Tencent also took the initiative to announce its own $15.5 billion social equity fund over the summer, only to have Alibaba announce its own $15.5 billion fund after the fact, a likely effort to do as well as Tencent in the eyes of regulators. Since much of China's crackdown appears to be aimed at companies exploiting their monopoly power to earn higher-than-normal profits, Tencent's deliberate monetization approach and the relative modesty of its management team may keep it out of harm's way -- or at least more out of harm's way than Alibaba. Amid high uncertainty, I'd rather pay up for business quality Alibaba does have several things going for it that Tencent doesn't. For one, it's more accessible to foreign investors since it trades on the New York Stock Exchange. Tencent trades only in Hong Kong, although U.S. investors can also purchase American depositary receipts that trade over the counter in the United States. Alibaba also has a lower valuation than Tencent, based on 2022 earnings estimates. Alibaba trades at only 15.5 times its fiscal 2023 earnings estimates (its fiscal year ends in March), while Tencent trades around 23.8 times 2022 earnings estimates.
Aantal posts per pagina:
20
50
100
Direct naar Forum
-- Selecteer een forum --
Koffiekamer
Belastingzaken
Beleggingsfondsen
Beursspel
BioPharma
Daytraders
Garantieproducten
Opties
Technische Analyse
Technische Analyse Software
Vastgoed
Warrants
10 van Tak
4Energy Invest
Aalberts
AB InBev
Abionyx Pharma
Ablynx
ABN AMRO
ABO-Group
Acacia Pharma
Accell Group
Accentis
Accsys Technologies
ACCSYS TECHNOLOGIES PLC
Ackermans & van Haaren
ADMA Biologics
Adomos
AdUX
Adyen
Aedifica
Aegon
AFC Ajax
Affimed NV
ageas
Agfa-Gevaert
Ahold
Air France - KLM
Airspray
Akka Technologies
AkzoNobel
Alfen
Allfunds Group
Allfunds Group
Almunda Professionals (vh Novisource)
Alpha Pro Tech
Alphabet Inc.
Altice
Alumexx ((Voorheen Phelix (voorheen Inverko))
AM
Amarin Corporation
Amerikaanse aandelen
AMG
AMS
Amsterdam Commodities
AMT Holding
Anavex Life Sciences Corp
Antonov
Aperam
Apollo Alternative Assets
Apple
Arcadis
Arcelor Mittal
Archos
Arcona Property Fund
arGEN-X
Aroundtown SA
Arrowhead Research
Ascencio
ASIT biotech
ASMI
ASML
ASR Nederland
ATAI Life Sciences
Atenor Group
Athlon Group
Atrium European Real Estate
Auplata
Avantium
Axsome Therapeutics
Azelis Group
Azerion
B&S Group
Baan
Ballast Nedam
BALTA GROUP N.V.
BAM Groep
Banco de Sabadell
Banimmo A
Barco
Barrick Gold
BASF SE
Basic-Fit
Basilix
Batenburg Beheer
BE Semiconductor
Beaulieulaan
Befimmo
Bekaert
Belgische aandelen
Beluga
Beter Bed
Bever
Binck
Biocartis
Biophytis
Biosynex
Biotalys
Bitcoin en andere cryptocurrencies
bluebird bio
Blydenstijn-Willink
BMW
BNP Paribas S.A.
Boeing Company
Bols (Lucas Bols N.V.)
Bone Therapeutics
Borr Drilling
Boskalis
BP PLC
bpost
Brand Funding
Brederode
Brill
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Brunel
C/Tac
Campine
Canadese aandelen
Care Property Invest
Carmila
Carrefour
Cate, ten
CECONOMY
Celyad
CFD's
CFE
CGG
Chinese aandelen
Cibox Interactive
Citygroup
Claranova
CM.com
Co.Br.Ha.
Coca-Cola European Partners
Cofinimmo
Cognosec
Colruyt
Commerzbank
Compagnie des Alpes
Compagnie du Bois Sauvage
Connect Group
Continental AG
Corbion
Core Labs
Corporate Express
Corus
Crescent (voorheen Option)
Crown van Gelder
Crucell
CTP
Curetis
CV-meter
Cyber Security 1 AB
Cybergun
D'Ieteren
D.E Master Blenders 1753
Deceuninck
Delta Lloyd
DEME
Deutsche Cannabis
DEUTSCHE POST AG
Dexia
DGB Group
DIA
Diegem Kennedy
Distri-Land Certificate
DNC
Dockwise
DPA Flex Group
Draka Holding
DSC2
DSM
Duitse aandelen
Dutch Star Companies ONE
Duurzaam Beleggen
DVRG
Ease2pay
Ebusco
Eckert-Ziegler
Econocom Group
Econosto
Edelmetalen
Ekopak
Elastic N.V.
Elia
Endemol
Energie
Energiekontor
Engie
Envipco
Erasmus Beursspel
Eriks
Esperite (voorheen Cryo Save)
EUR/USD
Eurobio
Eurocastle
Eurocommercial Properties
Euronav
Euronext
Euronext
Euronext.liffe Optiecompetitie
Europcar Mobility Group
Europlasma
EVC
EVS Broadcast Equipment
Exact
Exmar
Exor
Facebook
Fagron
Fastned
Fingerprint Cards AB
First Solar Inc
FlatexDeGiro
Floridienne
Flow Traders
Fluxys Belgium D
FNG (voorheen DICO International)
Fondsmanager Gezocht
ForFarmers
Fountain
Frans Maas
Franse aandelen
FuelCell Energy
Fugro
Futures
FX, Forex, foreign exchange market, valutamarkt
Galapagos
Gamma
Gaussin
GBL
Gemalto
General Electric
Genfit
Genmab
GeoJunxion
Getronics
Gilead Sciences
Gimv
Global Graphics
Goud
GrandVision
Great Panther Mining
Greenyard
Grolsch
Grondstoffen
Grontmij
Guru
Hagemeyer
HAL
Hamon Groep
Hedge funds: Haaien of helden?
Heijmans
Heineken
Hello Fresh
HES Beheer
Hitt
Holland Colours
Homburg Invest
Home Invest Belgium
Hoop Effektenbank, v.d.
Hunter Douglas
Hydratec Industries (v/h Nyloplast)
HyGear (NPEX effectenbeurs)
HYLORIS
Hypotheken
IBA
ICT Automatisering
Iep Invest (voorheen Punch International)
Ierse aandelen
IEX Group
IEX.nl Sparen
IMCD
Immo Moury
Immobel
Imtech
ING Groep
Innoconcepts
InPost
Insmed Incorporated (INSM)
IntegraGen
Intel
Intertrust
Intervest Offices & Warehouses
Intrasense
InVivo Therapeutics Holdings Corp (NVIV)
Isotis
JDE PEET'S
Jensen-Group
Jetix Europe
Johnson & Johnson
Just Eat Takeaway
Kardan
Kas Bank
KBC Ancora
KBC Groep
Kendrion
Keyware Technologies
Kiadis Pharma
Kinepolis Group
KKO International
Klépierre
KPN
KPNQwest
KUKA AG
La Jolla Pharmaceutical
Lavide Holding (voorheen Qurius)
LBC
LBI International
Leasinvest
Logica
Lotus Bakeries
Macintosh Retail Group
Majorel
Marel
Mastrad
Materialise NV
McGregor
MDxHealth
Mediq
Melexis
Merus Labs International
Merus NV
Microsoft
Miko
Mithra Pharmaceuticals
Montea
Moolen, van der
Mopoli
Morefield Group
Mota-Engil Africa
MotorK
Moury Construct
MTY Holdings (voorheen Alanheri)
Nationale Bank van België
Nationale Nederlanden
NBZ
Nedap
Nedfield
Nedschroef
Nedsense Enterpr
Nel ASA
Neoen SA
Neopost
Neovacs
NEPI Rockcastle
Netflix
New Sources Energy
Neways Electronics
NewTree
NexTech AR Solutions
NIBC
Nieuwe Steen Investments
Nintendo
Nokia
Nokia OYJ
Nokia Oyj
Novacyt
NOVO-NORDISK AS
NPEX
NR21
Numico
Nutreco
Nvidia
NWE Nederlandse AM Hypotheek Bank
NX Filtration
NXP Semiconductors NV
Nyrstar
Nyxoah
Océ
OCI
Octoplus
Oil States International
Onconova Therapeutics
Ontex
Onward Medical
Onxeo SA
OpenTV
OpGen
Opinies - Tilburg Trading Club
Opportunty Investment Management
Orange Belgium
Oranjewoud
Ordina Beheer
Oud ForFarmers
Oxurion (vh ThromboGenics)
P&O Nedlloyd
PAVmed
Payton Planar Magnetics
Perpetuals, Steepeners
Pershing Square Holdings Ltd
Personalized Nursing Services
Pfizer
Pharco
Pharming
Pharnext
Philips
Picanol
Pieris Pharmaceuticals
Plug Power
Politiek
Porceleyne Fles
Portugese aandelen
PostNL
Priority Telecom
Prologis Euro Prop
ProQR Therapeutics
PROSIEBENSAT.1 MEDIA SE
Prosus
Proximus
Qrf
Qualcomm
Quest For Growth
Rabobank Certificaat
Randstad
Range Beleggen
Recticel
Reed Elsevier
Reesink
Refresco Gerber
Reibel
Relief therapeutics
Renewi
Rente en valuta
Resilux
Retail Estates
RoodMicrotec
Roularta Media
Royal Bank Of Scotland
Royal Dutch Shell
RTL Group
RTL Group
S&P 500
Samas Groep
Sapec
SBM Offshore
Scandinavische (Noorse, Zweedse, Deense, Finse) aandelen
Schuitema
Seagull
Sequana Medical
Shurgard
Siemens Gamesa
Sif Holding
Signify
Simac
Sioen Industries
Sipef
Sligro Food Group
SMA Solar technology
Smartphoto Group
Smit Internationale
Snowworld
SNS Fundcoach Beleggingsfondsen Competitie
SNS Reaal
SNS Small & Midcap Competitie
Sofina
Softimat
Solocal Group
Solvac
Solvay
Sopheon
Spadel
Sparen voor later
Spectra7 Microsystems
Spotify
Spyker N.V.
Stellantis
Stellantis
Stern
Stork
Sucraf A en B
Sunrun
Super de Boer
SVK (Scheerders van Kerchove)
Syensqo
Systeem Trading
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)
Technicolor
Tele Atlas
Telegraaf Media
Telenet Groep Holding
Tencent Holdings Ltd
Tesla Motors Inc.
Tessenderlo Group
Tetragon Financial Group
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
Texaf
Theon International
TherapeuticsMD
Thunderbird Resorts
TIE
Tigenix
Tikkurila
TINC
TITAN CEMENT INTERNATIONAL
TKH Group
TMC
TNT Express
TomTom
Transocean
Trigano
Tubize
Turbo's
Twilio
UCB
Umicore
Unibail-Rodamco
Unifiedpost
Unilever
Unilever
uniQure
Unit 4 Agresso
Univar
Universal Music Group
USG People
Vallourec
Value8
Value8 Cum Pref
Van de Velde
Van Lanschot
Vastned
Vastned Retail Belgium
Vedior
VendexKBB
VEON
Vermogensbeheer
Versatel
VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS
VGP
Via Net.Works
Viohalco
Vivendi
Vivoryon Therapeutics
VNU
VolkerWessels
Volkswagen
Volta Finance
Vonovia
Vopak
Warehouses
Wave Life Sciences Ltd
Wavin
WDP
Wegener
Weibo Corp
Wereldhave
Wereldhave Belgium
Wessanen
What's Cooking
Wolters Kluwer
X-FAB
Xebec
Xeikon
Xior
Yatra Capital Limited
Zalando
Zenitel
Zénobe Gramme
Ziggo
Zilver - Silver World Spot (USD)