Van beleggers
voor beleggers
desktop iconMarkt Monitor
  • Word abonnee
  • Inloggen

    Inloggen

    • Geen account? Registreren

    Wachtwoord vergeten?

Ontvang nu dagelijks onze kooptips!

word abonnee

Aandeel Pharming Group AEX:PHARM.NL, NL0010391025

  • 0,905 24 apr 2024 17:35
  • 0,000 (0,00%) Dagrange 0,893 - 0,917
  • 6.519.524 Gem. (3M) 6,9M

FDA comes under fire for rapid Apple Watch approvals

8 Posts
| Omlaag ↓
  1. [verwijderd] 19 september 2018 17:01
    lees dit eens goed,

    www.healthdatamanagement.com/news/fda...

    ..What’s remarkable about the letters, says Thompson, is that Apple apparently filed its electrocardiogram (ECG) clearance application on August 14 and the Irregular Rhythm Notification Feature application on August 9.

    Thompson points out that these requests are for first-of-a-kind devices and as a result typically take longer to approve than a follow-on device cleared through the 510(k) process.

    “FDA’s goal with regard to reviewing de novo submissions is for FDA to ‘issue a decision within 150 FDA days of receipt of the submission for…50 percent of de novo requests received in FY 2018,’” according to Thompson. “To be clear, that means it’s expected that the other 50 percent will take longer than 150 days. FDA cleared not one but two Apple de novo reviews in fewer than 30 days. That’s remarkable.”

    While Thompson acknowledges that the time for FDA review can be shortened by having significant discussions and data sharing with a vendor in advance of an actual filing, he contends that it is “extremely rare to have a review that is less than 30 days.”

    In addition, Thompson is suspicious about the timing of the letters—one day prior to Apple’s September 12 launch event for the new products, which were announced in Cupertino, Calif., by Chief Operating Officer Jeff Williams.

    “Probably not coincidentally, on September 12, 2018—the very same day that Apple had its big event—FDA issued its own press release in support of what Apple was doing,” adds Thompson. “Others have asked me whether this is typical for FDA to accelerate a clearance review and issue a decision so as to coincide with a company preselected launch date for a new product. I’ve been doing this work for over 30 years, and I’ve never heard of that.”
  2. Burdie65 19 september 2018 20:56
    Het is inderdaad wél opmerkelijk te noemen dat een nieuw medicijn van Shire een goedkeuring krijgt en een reeds in omloop zijnde (Ruconest) en voor preventief gebruik ook zich heeft bewezen...., (kijk naar Ervaringen met Ruconest) nog in de wachtkamer wordt gezet!!!

    Zou er bij de FDA iemand hebben liggen te slapen, of ligt hij nu te zwemmen in het geld? Och...., dossiertje verwisseld..., sorry!!

    Dit is maar een zinspeling maar ik hoop van harte dat het spel wat gespeeld wordt wel eerlijk verloopt!
8 Posts
|Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met je emailadres en wachtwoord.

Direct naar Forum

Premium

Logische herfinanciering Pharming

Het laatste advies leest u als abonnee van IEX Premium

Inloggen Word Abonnee

Lees verder op het IEX netwerk Let op: Artikelen linken naar andere sites

Gesponsorde links