Ontvang nu dagelijks onze kooptips!
word abonnee
sluiten ✕
22 augustus halfjaar cijfers
Ik hoop dat ze nu voor deze prijzen veel aandelen van de markt halen. Ze hebben zat in kas!
Maar die van mij krijgen ze niet. Potentie is prima. Komt goed. gewoon geduld hebben. Laat ze zoals al jaren lekker op de plank liggen.
Ben nog steeds zonder Soof, geloof nog in een algehele correctie. Dus nog even aan se zijlijn . Suc6 allemaal Trinko
Wanneer, en bij welke prijs stap je weer in Trinko
Weet ik niet , maar wacht op een algehele correctie, verwacht AEX laag 400 hoog 300 dan zou Soof de 5 ziet, maar dat weet ik niet maar daar hoop ik weer en te stappen Maar waarschijnlijk ergens in de 6. We zullen zien Gr Trinko
aardige orders vandaag...
www.sopheon.com/food-beverage-innovat... A number of leaders in food and beverage innovation, including PepsiCo., Wrigley, Heinz, Land O’Lakes, Hormel and J.M. Smuckers, use Sopheon’s Accolade solution Wrigley is een nieuwe klant.
marblesthegame schreef op 6 augustus 2019 18:44 :
www.sopheon.com/food-beverage-innovat... A number of leaders in food and beverage innovation, including PepsiCo., Wrigley, Heinz, Land O’Lakes, Hormel and J.M. Smuckers, use Sopheon’s Accolade solution
Wrigley is een nieuwe klant.
Mooi lijstje van klanten. Wrigley is (volgens mij) onderdeel van Mars. Groet ABC
Allemaal mooi! Maar we zitten hier voor de pegels! En tot hoever moet die gifbeker leeg?
Ben niet zo heel erg thuis in deze business. Ik begrijp da SaaS de toekomst heeft boven een licentiemodel. Kwam onderstaand tegen. Misschien ook voor anderen interessant: De toekomst van de SaaS-sector De opkomst van Software-as-a-Service heeft geleid tot een aparte sector die producten en services op abonnementsbasis aanbiedt. Dat heeft ook gevolgen voor de klant: die doet niet langer eenmalig een op zichzelf staande aanschaf, maar betaalt periodiek voor een abonnement en blijft dus behouden. Op basis van deze trend voorspelt Gartner dat in het jaar 2020 meer dan 80% van de softwareleveranciers is overgestapt van het aloude licentie- en onderhoudsmodel op een abonnementsmodel.www.salesforce.com/nl/learning-centre...
Naar aanleiding van bovenstaande kwamen er wat vragen op. Misschien iemand zin/tijd om er iets over te zeggen? 1. in maart jl stond recurring revenue op $15milj. Welke hoogte verachten jullie in au. A.s. bij de l update 2. Begrijp ik het goed dat SaaS impliceert geen implementatie meer nodig dus soof kan nog meer tijd/aandacht besteden aan sales 3. Betekent SaaS ook dat kleinere bedrijven bv MKB ook interessant worden als klant en eerder geneigd zullen een "abonnement" af te sluiten ( hoeven geen grote investering te doen) 4. Soof heeft het al een tijdje over M&A opportunities; verwachten jullie dat die van doen hebben met SaaS en zo ja, hoe? Ik ben benieuwd
Bij de verandering naar SaaS model gaat revurring revenue een meer belangrijke rol spelen. Dit schreef Soof eind maart over Recurring Revenue As noted in the Chairman’s Statement we recognize that recurring revenue is both fundamental to our long-term growth and important to the investor community, and we are actively considering ways to further enhance the recurring profile of the business. The Group’s base of recurring business rose to $15m at the end of 2018, compared to $12m the year before. Maintenance alone has a run rate of $12m, with an additional $1.5m each in hosting services and Software as a Service (SaaS) subscriptions. The majority of our license revenue continues to remain perpetual in nature, but we continue to see growing interest in SaaS options. During 2018 we signed five new SaaS deals compared to three the year before, demonstrating growing traction in this important area of corporate development. We are also seeing further take-up of our hosting service from new and existing perpetual customers, and we continue to extend the scope of our security infrastructure to ensure this service remains an attractive proposition. Over a quarter of our active perpetual customers are hosted by Sopheon. Overall retention of recurring revenue increased to 97 percent by value (2017: 95 percent). In this regard we continue to invest in customer satisfaction programs alongside regular service and account management processes to maximize value for our customers.
Introduction Are you currently looking for a new software for your company? Are you trying to digitize a business process, or to replace a legacy solution? Are you trying to choose between a SaaS or Perpetual license solution, and would like to know which option fits your needs best? If so, you might want to take a quick look at this article, as choosing the right software type is an important element of your IT strategy. Choosing between the two depends on a lot of factors and there isn’t any magical formula that works for all kinds of businesses. SaaS Licensing SaaS or Software as a Service License is a “subscription” based software service. Let’s say that one day you search the web to find an answer to some problem. After a search, you come across a magazine that has content that you find interesting and helpful. You decide to subscribe to that magazine as it will provide periodic and useful information that will help you address your problems. The SaaS is just like the magazine subscription. So you need a software that will help your team solve problems and increase productivity. A quick online reach reviles a software that fits perfectly to what you were looking for. Most companies offer a free trial version of their software for you to try out to make sure that it is exactly what you were hoping for. After the trial period is over, you get a chance to subscribe to a monthly, quarterly, or annually service. Once you subscribe, you will receive all the latest updates and versions of the software. With SaaS, you as the customer do not have to build up any expensive IT infrastructure like servers, data centers or admin staff. The software is delivered online via a browser and it is hosted by the vendor. So you not only pay the subscription for the software, but also for the necessary infrastructure, maintenance, support, and new versions of the software. In other words, SaaS replaces the capital outlay of buying software licenses and subscription payments make software more affordable. Perpetual Licensing Perpetual License is a “Paid in Full” based software. Imagine you don’t like to wait and have a full control over something, like watching a TV Show. Instead of waiting each week to watch one short episode of your new favorite TV Show, you go to the store and purchase the entire season so that you can watch it whenever and however you want. Unfortunately, once another season comes out, you need to go to the store and buy the new season. The same goes for Perpetual Software. If you don’t like to make payments and you have all the means to pay the full price of the software, you have an option to do it. Buying the software gives you what you need with some periodic updates. Unlike the SaaS, with Perpetual License you as the customer pay for the software upfront with knowledge of limited support and updates time period. You ultimately absorb all the costs associated with the IT infrastructure, maintenance, and admin staff. On top of the license fee, you have the option to pay for one-off implementation services and support contract, which is renewed annually. The Pros and Cons at a Glance Based on these two scenarios, which one do you think is a better option? Let’s dig a bit deeper into Pros and Cons associated with each license type. Let’s break it down even further by segments: Payment Companies often choose SaaS solutions because of the budget situation in their company. A large point in favor of this type of contract from the customer perspective often is to avoid lengthy capital expenditure approval processes. As mentioned above, for the SaaS the payments are made on a monthly base and are typically recurring and service is dependent on payment of the subscription period. SaaS subscription plans can be and hence usually are priced to fit into the budgets of departments, which means the decisions can be made there and don’t need to be funneled into complicated corporate approval processes. Also, because of restricted budgets, companies often have small IT departments, which have very long delivery cycles and are usually themselves very restricted by internal budgets and, hence, cannot deliver new functionality short term For the Perpetual, the payment is made as one-time up-front payment and may require the approval from the companies management. With the up-front cost, you as the customer are not at the mercy of a subscription service provider and can use the software indefinitely. Implementation and Customization For most SaaS, the customers will receive some type of client-configuration to ensure that the service runs/connects to their existing system. However, if the customer requires some type of unique customization, such service comes at a steep price. Perpetual license software requires a totally different set-up at the customer, involving expensive hardware, data center resources (facility and electricity), in-house IT stuff for the infrastructure, often resilience measures and almost always substantial implementation cost (either internally or with system integrators). Upgrades/Support With SaaS, upgrades and support typically are part of the subscription fee. In most cases, the customer will not have any downtime during updates and support is offered 24 hours a day. As far as Perpetual software, the license comes with limited warranty and support. Depending on the license, the customer may have 90 days to a year support with updates or until a newer version of the software is released. Security Since customer’s sensitive information is stored and hosted on the service providers systems, the service provider is obligated to provide contractual protection. Such protections include security warranties, audits, 3rd party certifications, data breach notifications, and last but not least cyber-attack insurance. Since Perpetual license software is hosted by the customer, the customer will presume control over the security of their data. In some cases, the specific software has to run on a separate server that can’t have internet access according to companies security policies. In these cases, a perpetual licensing model is the only choice. Over time, the Perpetual license software may become a “legacy” software and will no longer be up to date and open to the latest cyber threats. In such cases, the customer will have no choice but to upgrade to the latest version of the software. Transition/Migration When a customer subscribes to SaaS, it needs to consider up front how the information will be transitioned off-site. One thing to consider when purchasing SaaS is to ensure that you as the customer will receive periodic data backups exported into a usable form or other formats. Since no software will be used forever, with Perpetually licensed software the data migration and transition will depend on where the data is stored and if the customer has access to source code. Some vendors will provide assistance with migration and transition however if that process isn’t simple, the vendor may offer another service agreement to fully complete the project. So, if you are debating on which one is better or worse, there is really no wrong answer here. You as the company have the means to answer that question and decide what is best for your company. Before making any decisions, here a few questions that might help. Do you want to own the licenses or not? Do you have the cash flow to buy the licenses? Do you have the IT infrastructure to host the new software? How important are the updates and new releases to your company
Wat betekent omschakeling van perpetual licensing naar SaaS voor Soof?: How does this impact the software vendor on the other side? A shift in buying power from central buyers to more departmental buyers, the need for more business and solution oriented sales approaches and usually much shorter sales cycles. This all obviously has great impact on the sales and marketing cost. And since SaaS business starts every year with last year’s revenue level (minus churn, a whole new area of science) it basically enables these businesses to grow as much new business as last year without any additional sales and marketing cost (BTW – this was true for on-prem subscriptions, too, until recently, but IFRS 15 and the corresponding US-GAAP regulation changed that. Look into the comments for some additional info). Keeping sales and marketing cost flat at a traditional perpetual license model means your company will stagnate. This is one reason why revenues from both business models are not comparable, nor are their cost structures in percent of revenue. Another reason is the fact that SaaS and subscription opened the software market for many new customer segments that previously couldn’t afford software licenses and implementations for millions of dollars. And last but not least, the two models are in different maturity states – one is growing like crazy and the other is stable at best.
Dank Nico. Duidelijk verhaal waarom de omzet op korte termijn niet groeit maar op langere termijn wel. Dus die omschakeling gaat retesnel. Gr Arie de Beuker
Daarom is de omtwikkeling wel interessant vind ik. Onderstaande punten licht ik eruit want na die zure appel kan het eel eens hard gaan: - And since SaaS business starts every year with last year’s revenue level (minus churn, a whole new area of science) it basically enables these businesses to grow as much new business as last year without any additional sales and marketing cost - Another reason is the fact that SaaS and subscription opened the software market for many new customer segments that previously couldn’t afford software licenses and implementations for millions of dollars
We gaan het beleven Nico. Dank voor het delen van informatie en je denkwijze. Gr Arie de Beuker
Dank voor de link Universal investment gesellschaft, geen kleine jongen als investeerder
Aantal posts per pagina:
20
50
100
Direct naar Forum
-- Selecteer een forum --
Koffiekamer
Belastingzaken
Beleggingsfondsen
Beursspel
BioPharma
Daytraders
Garantieproducten
Opties
Technische Analyse
Technische Analyse Software
Vastgoed
Warrants
10 van Tak
4Energy Invest
Aalberts
AB InBev
Abionyx Pharma
Ablynx
ABN AMRO
ABO-Group
Acacia Pharma
Accell Group
Accentis
Accsys Technologies
ACCSYS TECHNOLOGIES PLC
Ackermans & van Haaren
ADMA Biologics
Adomos
AdUX
Adyen
Aedifica
Aegon
AFC Ajax
Affimed NV
ageas
Agfa-Gevaert
Ahold
Air France - KLM
Airspray
Akka Technologies
AkzoNobel
Alfen
Allfunds Group
Allfunds Group
Almunda Professionals (vh Novisource)
Alpha Pro Tech
Alphabet Inc.
Altice
Alumexx ((Voorheen Phelix (voorheen Inverko))
AM
Amarin Corporation
Amerikaanse aandelen
AMG
AMS
Amsterdam Commodities
AMT Holding
Anavex Life Sciences Corp
Antonov
Aperam
Apollo Alternative Assets
Apple
Arcadis
Arcelor Mittal
Archos
Arcona Property Fund
arGEN-X
Aroundtown SA
Arrowhead Research
Ascencio
ASIT biotech
ASMI
ASML
ASR Nederland
ATAI Life Sciences
Atenor Group
Athlon Group
Atrium European Real Estate
Auplata
Avantium
Axsome Therapeutics
Azelis Group
Azerion
B&S Group
Baan
Ballast Nedam
BALTA GROUP N.V.
BAM Groep
Banco de Sabadell
Banimmo A
Barco
Barrick Gold
BASF SE
Basic-Fit
Basilix
Batenburg Beheer
BE Semiconductor
Beaulieulaan
Befimmo
Bekaert
Belgische aandelen
Beluga
Beter Bed
Bever
Binck
Biocartis
Biophytis
Biosynex
Biotalys
Bitcoin en andere cryptocurrencies
bluebird bio
Blydenstijn-Willink
BMW
BNP Paribas S.A.
Boeing Company
Bols (Lucas Bols N.V.)
Bone Therapeutics
Borr Drilling
Boskalis
BP PLC
bpost
Brand Funding
Brederode
Brill
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Brunel
C/Tac
Campine
Canadese aandelen
Care Property Invest
Carmila
Carrefour
Cate, ten
CECONOMY
Celyad
CFD's
CFE
CGG
Chinese aandelen
Cibox Interactive
Citygroup
Claranova
CM.com
Co.Br.Ha.
Coca-Cola European Partners
Cofinimmo
Cognosec
Colruyt
Commerzbank
Compagnie des Alpes
Compagnie du Bois Sauvage
Connect Group
Continental AG
Corbion
Core Labs
Corporate Express
Corus
Crescent (voorheen Option)
Crown van Gelder
Crucell
CTP
Curetis
CV-meter
Cyber Security 1 AB
Cybergun
D'Ieteren
D.E Master Blenders 1753
Deceuninck
Delta Lloyd
DEME
Deutsche Cannabis
DEUTSCHE POST AG
Dexia
DGB Group
DIA
Diegem Kennedy
Distri-Land Certificate
DNC
Dockwise
DPA Flex Group
Draka Holding
DSC2
DSM
Duitse aandelen
Dutch Star Companies ONE
Duurzaam Beleggen
DVRG
Ease2pay
Ebusco
Eckert-Ziegler
Econocom Group
Econosto
Edelmetalen
Ekopak
Elastic N.V.
Elia
Endemol
Energie
Energiekontor
Engie
Envipco
Erasmus Beursspel
Eriks
Esperite (voorheen Cryo Save)
EUR/USD
Eurobio
Eurocastle
Eurocommercial Properties
Euronav
Euronext
Euronext
Euronext.liffe Optiecompetitie
Europcar Mobility Group
Europlasma
EVC
EVS Broadcast Equipment
Exact
Exmar
Exor
Facebook
Fagron
Fastned
Fingerprint Cards AB
First Solar Inc
FlatexDeGiro
Floridienne
Flow Traders
Fluxys Belgium D
FNG (voorheen DICO International)
Fondsmanager Gezocht
ForFarmers
Fountain
Frans Maas
Franse aandelen
FuelCell Energy
Fugro
Futures
FX, Forex, foreign exchange market, valutamarkt
Galapagos
Gamma
Gaussin
GBL
Gemalto
General Electric
Genfit
Genmab
GeoJunxion
Getronics
Gilead Sciences
Gimv
Global Graphics
Goud
GrandVision
Great Panther Mining
Greenyard
Grolsch
Grondstoffen
Grontmij
Guru
Hagemeyer
HAL
Hamon Groep
Hedge funds: Haaien of helden?
Heijmans
Heineken
Hello Fresh
HES Beheer
Hitt
Holland Colours
Homburg Invest
Home Invest Belgium
Hoop Effektenbank, v.d.
Hunter Douglas
Hydratec Industries (v/h Nyloplast)
HyGear (NPEX effectenbeurs)
HYLORIS
Hypotheken
IBA
ICT Automatisering
Iep Invest (voorheen Punch International)
Ierse aandelen
IEX Group
IEX.nl Sparen
IMCD
Immo Moury
Immobel
Imtech
ING Groep
Innoconcepts
InPost
Insmed Incorporated (INSM)
IntegraGen
Intel
Intertrust
Intervest Offices & Warehouses
Intrasense
InVivo Therapeutics Holdings Corp (NVIV)
Isotis
JDE PEET'S
Jensen-Group
Jetix Europe
Johnson & Johnson
Just Eat Takeaway
Kardan
Kas Bank
KBC Ancora
KBC Groep
Kendrion
Keyware Technologies
Kiadis Pharma
Kinepolis Group
KKO International
Klépierre
KPN
KPNQwest
KUKA AG
La Jolla Pharmaceutical
Lavide Holding (voorheen Qurius)
LBC
LBI International
Leasinvest
Logica
Lotus Bakeries
Macintosh Retail Group
Majorel
Marel
Mastrad
Materialise NV
McGregor
MDxHealth
Mediq
Melexis
Merus Labs International
Merus NV
Microsoft
Miko
Mithra Pharmaceuticals
Montea
Moolen, van der
Mopoli
Morefield Group
Mota-Engil Africa
MotorK
Moury Construct
MTY Holdings (voorheen Alanheri)
Nationale Bank van België
Nationale Nederlanden
NBZ
Nedap
Nedfield
Nedschroef
Nedsense Enterpr
Nel ASA
Neoen SA
Neopost
Neovacs
NEPI Rockcastle
Netflix
New Sources Energy
Neways Electronics
NewTree
NexTech AR Solutions
NIBC
Nieuwe Steen Investments
Nintendo
Nokia
Nokia OYJ
Nokia Oyj
Novacyt
NOVO-NORDISK AS
NPEX
NR21
Numico
Nutreco
Nvidia
NWE Nederlandse AM Hypotheek Bank
NX Filtration
NXP Semiconductors NV
Nyrstar
Nyxoah
Océ
OCI
Octoplus
Oil States International
Onconova Therapeutics
Ontex
Onward Medical
Onxeo SA
OpenTV
OpGen
Opinies - Tilburg Trading Club
Opportunty Investment Management
Orange Belgium
Oranjewoud
Ordina Beheer
Oud ForFarmers
Oxurion (vh ThromboGenics)
P&O Nedlloyd
PAVmed
Payton Planar Magnetics
Perpetuals, Steepeners
Pershing Square Holdings Ltd
Personalized Nursing Services
Pfizer
Pharco
Pharming
Pharnext
Philips
Picanol
Pieris Pharmaceuticals
Plug Power
Politiek
Porceleyne Fles
Portugese aandelen
PostNL
Priority Telecom
Prologis Euro Prop
ProQR Therapeutics
PROSIEBENSAT.1 MEDIA SE
Prosus
Proximus
Qrf
Qualcomm
Quest For Growth
Rabobank Certificaat
Randstad
Range Beleggen
Recticel
Reed Elsevier
Reesink
Refresco Gerber
Reibel
Relief therapeutics
Renewi
Rente en valuta
Resilux
Retail Estates
RoodMicrotec
Roularta Media
Royal Bank Of Scotland
Royal Dutch Shell
RTL Group
RTL Group
S&P 500
Samas Groep
Sapec
SBM Offshore
Scandinavische (Noorse, Zweedse, Deense, Finse) aandelen
Schuitema
Seagull
Sequana Medical
Shurgard
Siemens Gamesa
Sif Holding
Signify
Simac
Sioen Industries
Sipef
Sligro Food Group
SMA Solar technology
Smartphoto Group
Smit Internationale
Snowworld
SNS Fundcoach Beleggingsfondsen Competitie
SNS Reaal
SNS Small & Midcap Competitie
Sofina
Softimat
Solocal Group
Solvac
Solvay
Sopheon
Spadel
Sparen voor later
Spectra7 Microsystems
Spotify
Spyker N.V.
Stellantis
Stellantis
Stern
Stork
Sucraf A en B
Sunrun
Super de Boer
SVK (Scheerders van Kerchove)
Syensqo
Systeem Trading
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)
Technicolor
Tele Atlas
Telegraaf Media
Telenet Groep Holding
Tencent Holdings Ltd
Tesla Motors Inc.
Tessenderlo Group
Tetragon Financial Group
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
Texaf
Theon International
TherapeuticsMD
Thunderbird Resorts
TIE
Tigenix
Tikkurila
TINC
TITAN CEMENT INTERNATIONAL
TKH Group
TMC
TNT Express
TomTom
Transocean
Trigano
Tubize
Turbo's
Twilio
UCB
Umicore
Unibail-Rodamco
Unifiedpost
Unilever
Unilever
uniQure
Unit 4 Agresso
Univar
Universal Music Group
USG People
Vallourec
Value8
Value8 Cum Pref
Van de Velde
Van Lanschot
Vastned
Vastned Retail Belgium
Vedior
VendexKBB
VEON
Vermogensbeheer
Versatel
VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS
VGP
Via Net.Works
Viohalco
Vivendi
Vivoryon Therapeutics
VNU
VolkerWessels
Volkswagen
Volta Finance
Vonovia
Vopak
Warehouses
Wave Life Sciences Ltd
Wavin
WDP
Wegener
Weibo Corp
Wereldhave
Wereldhave Belgium
Wessanen
What's Cooking
Wolters Kluwer
X-FAB
Xebec
Xeikon
Xior
Yatra Capital Limited
Zalando
Zenitel
Zénobe Gramme
Ziggo
Zilver - Silver World Spot (USD)
Indices
AEX
860,01
-0,62%
EUR/USD
1,0655
+0,11%
FTSE 100
7.895,85
+0,24%
Germany40^
17.714,20
-0,13%
Gold spot
2.392,50
0,00%
NY-Nasdaq Composite
15.282,01
-2,05%
Stijgers
Dalers